Month: July 2022

Double Sales – Property

DOUBLE SALES

Have you ever found yourself in a situation where you find out that a property that you have purchased was sold to someone else as well? If the answer to this question is Yes, then this article is for you.

The concept of double sales came about as a result of the greedy and dishonest nature that individuals possess. As a result, citizens are duped / defrauded of their hard earned money and are conned into purchasing properties that may have already been sold to someone else. Double sales may be defined as the corrupt or rather fraudulent sale of property by one (the seller) to at least two different parties (the purchasers).

Members of the public are strongly advised by the to conduct a Deeds search at the Deeds Registry in either Bulawayo or Harare depending on where the property that one intends to purchase is located, prior to concluding the sale. This will save a lot of clients from possibly falling victim to these criminals that sell the same property more than once.

The Deeds search provides following information;

  • That the Deed actually exists and is registered in the system (that it is not a fake Title deed)
  • The details of the owner such as their name, date of birth and Identity number.
  • Extent (size) of the property
  • Where the property is situated (accurate property description)
  • Conditions imposed on the property
  • Date of registration
  • Whether the property has been pledged as security (collateral) for a loan

After having done the initial Deeds search one can then trace all prior Deeds and previous owners of the property, leading up to the current Title Deed.

The above mentioned measure is a precautionary one but in the event that one has already succumbed to such a scam then they may resort to the Courts for recourse. The remedy that is available to parties is making a claim in the Courts for specific performance for one party and a claim for damages for the other party. A criminal case may also be pursued against the seller in such a case. One may note that in the case of the two purchasers the Courts tend to favour the first buyer as opposed to the second one especially where transfer has not been effected, this stance was highlighted in the decided case of Guga v Moyo & Ors where it was held that;

“the basic rule in double sales where transfer has not been passed to either party is that the first purchaser should succeed. The first in time is the stronger in law. The second purchaser is left with a claim for damages from the seller, which is usually small comfort. But the rule applies only in the absence of special circumstances affecting the balance of equities”.

There are instances where the second buyer was aware of the first sale and in such cases the courts exercise no leniency towards the second buyer as they willingly entered into a fraudulent sale however such a party can lay a claim against the seller for funds paid.

There are some exceptions to the position that the first purchaser is given preference over the second buyer and the circumstances have been laid out in case law. The court tends to look at the balance of equity and as a result of such there are instances where the second purchaser may be awarded the property instead of the first purchaser such as that the second purchaser was not aware of the first sale and/or the second purchaser has made improvements to the property and/or transfer of the property has been done in favour of the second purchaser. In such instances the Court reserves the right to make a ruling that the property be awarded to the second purchaser. The Court exercises its discretion in matters of such a nature.

In the event that you have been a victim of such a circumstance please do not hesitate to engage our team of legal practitioners that is ready to assist.

 

This article is for general information purposes only-seek the professional legal advice.

Private Prosecution

Private prosecution is prosecution that is initiated by a private person that has an interest in the matter. In Zimbabwe most prosecutions are conducted by the          State however, it is permissible for a private party to prosecute a case. A private citizen in terms of Section 13 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act must show cause why they should be allowed to prosecute. The individual must show substantial or peculiar interest in the conviction of the offender which will be as a result of some form of injury that they suffered stemming from the commission of the crime. The private prosecutor bears the burden of proving that the standards highlighted above have been met.

It’s worth noting that a person who has not been personally impacted by a crime can nevertheless prosecute it under Section 14 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act;

14  What other persons entitled to prosecute

The following shall possess the right of prosecution —

a spouse of the person in respect of whom the offence was committed;

(b)   the legal guardians or curators of minors or mentally disordered or defective persons, in respect of offences committed against their wards;

    (c)   the surviving spouse or children or, where there is no surviving spouse or child, any of the next-of-kin of any deceased person, in respect of any offence by which the death of such person is alleged to have been caused;

(d)   public bodies and persons on whom the right is specially conferred by statute, in respect of particular offences.

For a private citizen to institute proceedings they must have a certificate known as a nolle prosequi from the Prosecutor General which highlights that the Prosecutor General shall not prosecute the case and resultantly he/she issues the certificate to the private party that shall prosecute the case. Before being given the certificate, one submits a written request to the Prosecutor General that they have a substantial right in the matter, that they are a victim of the alleged offence or an interested party that is not the victim, but suffered directly as a result of the alleged offence’ has the means to prosecute effectively and timeously and that they will prosecute the case as an individual. Section 16(2) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act gives the precise requirement to be satisfied, it states that –

16  Certificate of Prosecutor-General that he or she declines to prosecute

(2)  The Prosecutor-General shall grant the certificate referred to in subsection (1) if—

(a)   there is produced to him or her by the private party a written request in the form of a sworn statement from which it appears to the Prosecutor-General that the private party—

  • is the victim of the alleged offence, or is otherwise an interested person by virtue of having personally suffered, as a direct consequence of the alleged offence, an invasion of a legal right beyond that suffered by the public generally; and
  • has the means to conduct the private prosecution promptly and timeously; and
  • will conduct the private prosecution as an individual (whether personally or through his or her legal practitioner), or as the representative of a class of individuals recognised as a class for the purposes of the Class Actions Act [Chapter 8:17] (No. 10 of 1999); and

(b)   no grounds exist in terms of subsection (3) for withholding the certificate.

The Prosecutor General grants the certificate (nolle prosequi) is at their discretion, considering factors such as prospects of success if the case is tried (proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt looking at the whether there is sufficient evidence to try the case); whether or not it is against the interests of public and national security, and whether or not the conduct complained of by the private party discloses (constitutes) a criminal offence.

In some circumstances a certificate from the Prosecutor General is not required for private prosecution to occur, where the Prosecutor General has by way of his/her action communicated their desire not to proceed with prosecution. Where the accused is already incarcerated or out in terms of Section 10 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act, the private prosecutor can apply to the High Court or a Judge for a warrant for the accused person’s further detention. Such conduct may be taken as the Prosecutor General not prosecuting the case.

In terms of Section 17 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act a private prosecutor other than that stipulated in Section 14(d) may be called upon to furnish security for costs to cater for the costs that would have been incurred by the accused person in defending the case in the event of their acquittal as well as other costs that may be required by the registrar, clerk of court or any other concerned office for any criminal process that must be done in relation to the case. The same stance is noted where the private prosecution is successful at the discretion of the court the state or guilty party  may be called upon to pay to the private prosecutor the costs they incurred in pursuing the case. In the event that the prosecution stemmed from malice the court may exercise its discretion to order the private prosecutor to pay additional costs as maybe determined by the court.

A Legal Practitioner may represent their client in a private prosecution case the details of such shall be discussed in the next article.

This article is for general information purposes. Please seek advice from your lawyer.

Watching Brief

A watching brief is a legal process in which a legal practitioner observes and monitors the arrest and prosecution of an accused person, to ensure that the law as well as due process are upheld.

The legal practitioner will be acting under the instruction of a client, who is either the complainant or the victim in the matter. The role of the legal practitioner is to observe and ensure that the law is complied with, securing a conviction is not one of the duties of the legal practitioner.

Usually, criminal prosecutions are done at the instance of the State (prosecutor) who represents the complainant and/or the victims, and in instances of a watching brief the legal practitioner works with the prosecution to ensure that criminal procedure and the law are observed during the course of the trial. Some of the other duties that a legal practitioner may perform include ensuring that the accused is charged correctly; that the charge sheet and State outline are properly drafted, that the rightful witnesses are selected and their statements are recorded, the rightful evidence is secured and presented at trial, and helping to prepare questions to be asked during trial.

Take note that a watching brief is not exercised in a bid to undermine the State. A legal practitioner has no audience with the court and will only introduce themselves at the beginning of the case, anything else that they want to say shall be done through the prosecutor as the prosecution is trying the case. There are some advantages to such process as it reduces the chances of bribery of either the Judicial officer and or prosecutor; ensures that no deliberate efforts by the prosecutor to have the accused acquitted prevail, and allowing for the prevalence of justice.

The watching brief process is very useful as it tends to reduce instances of corruption or bribery of the state and or police officials by the accused person or their relatives (not the case in all instances).

 

This article is for general information purposes only. Seek legal advice from your Lawyer